In today’s society, honesty is often considered a virtue and deception is often frowned upon. We are taught from a young age to always tell the truth and to be honest in our interactions with others. However, philosopher Sam Berstler argues that there are certain social norms that allow for open deception, and that these norms serve an important purpose in our society.
Firstly, it is important to understand what is meant by “open deception”. This refers to situations where individuals are knowingly and openly deceiving others, and yet it is still accepted within society. For example, a salesperson may exaggerate the benefits of a product in order to make a sale, or a politician may make promises they have no intention of keeping in order to gain votes. These are both examples of open deception, where the deceiver is not trying to hide their actions or intentions.
According to Berstler, the reason why these types of deception are accepted in our society is because they serve a greater good. In the case of the salesperson, their deception may result in a sale, which benefits both the company and the consumer. The consumer gets a product they want, and the company makes a profit. Similarly, in the case of politicians, their promises may result in policies being implemented that benefit the greater population.
But why do we have these social norms that allow for open deception? Berstler argues that it is because humans are inherently selfish beings. We are driven by our own self-interest and will often do whatever it takes to achieve our goals. Therefore, in a society where everyone is looking out for their own interests, it becomes necessary to have certain norms that allow for open deception in order to maintain a functioning society.
Another reason why open deception is accepted in our society is because it is often difficult to determine what is true and what is not. In a world where information is constantly being shared and opinions are constantly being expressed, it can be hard to decipher what is fact and what is fiction. This creates a grey area where open deception can thrive, as people can easily manipulate the truth to suit their own agendas.
Furthermore, Berstler argues that without these social norms that allow for open deception, our society would become stagnant and progress would be hindered. In order for change to occur, people often need to be convinced to adopt new ideas or beliefs. This requires persuasion and often involves some level of deception. For example, when a new product or technology is introduced, companies often use marketing tactics that exaggerate the benefits in order to persuade consumers to try it. Without these tactics, it would be much harder to convince people to try something new and progress would be slow.
However, it is important to note that while open deception may serve a purpose in our society, it is not always ethical or morally justifiable. Berstler acknowledges that there are certainly cases where open deception is harmful and crosses the line. For example, when a company knowingly sells a dangerous product or when a politician makes false promises that harm the public. In these cases, open deception is not acceptable and should be called out.
In conclusion, philosopher Sam Berstler makes a compelling argument for why we have social norms that allow for open deception. These norms serve a greater good in our society by allowing for progress, persuasion, and the pursuit of self-interest. However, it is important to be aware of the potential harm that can come from open deception and to hold those who abuse it accountable. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to determine the ethical boundaries of open deception and to use it responsibly.
